Intriguing Questions from a Chance Meeting (part 2 of 3)
Yesterday I mentioned a conversation I had on an airplane with a Christian fellow. He e-mailed me several questions a few days back. Here's the second question, and my (lengthy) response.
Have you seen the church minimize the act by making it rote or mundane, therefore causing the body to make it more of a ritual than a very sincere act of worship?
First of all, however, I'd like to make an observation. Your question about ritual and worship seems to presume that all ritual is rote or mundane. Actually, ritual can be - should be - an important part of human life. Rituals are actions that serve as symbols – they help us express our beliefs, values and deepest concerns (e.g. the Olympic games express the natural human desire to be ‘faster, higher, stronger’, as well as our desire for peace. In the Olympics we are for a time united in games we share, the athlete's commitment to a goal, and respect for other cultures.) Christmas dinner is often a loose ritual: gathering of generations, remembering the past, celebrating our love, enjoying our bounty.
By the way, I should say a few words about symbols: they are powerful conveyors of meaning and thus are suited to describing experiences of faith. Jesus used symbols when he said "the Kingdom of God is like a mustard seed..." or compared the kingdom to a wedding feast. A good symbol has a variety of meanings and possible interpretations. There's a richness to them that goes beyond a sign, which points to one and only one thing. Symbols, like a cross, or an altar, or even a kiss, take a difficult concept and expresses it in more understandable realities. Thus symbols are used to help us recognize the sacred. It is a contemporary bias that says something is ‘just’ a symbol. Why then are we showing the flag everywhere? Why was it such a powerful moment in September, 2001 to raise the flag over ground zero? Symbols can be quite powerful!
Now, back to ritual... Some actions are practical – walking to school – these would be routines. Other similar actions are rituals – walking in the street in a parade, a protest march, a procession: these actions symbolize an important reality: community pride, solemnity of occasion, right to free speech, solidarity with another group. Eating is a practical action, and can be a routine. Saying grace before meals can be a ritual that reminds us of the gift of food and the beauty of sharing it. But grace before meals can become another routine if it’s rushed and hurried through without thinking of the significance of the prayer. So, too, a kiss between husband and wife before one or the other or both leave the home in the morning can be a wonderful ritual symbolizing their mutual devotion, or it can become a routine. We humans have a real struggle staying rooted in the present moment - especially in our hyperactive, ADHD-inducing culture.
I hope you begin to see rituals are important in life - essential, really
1) they are movements and gestures with meaning (shaking hands, applause, bowing)
2) they are repeated because the event is significant (an annual visit to a grave)
3) they are symbolic celebrations that break the routine of life (the Olympics)
4) rites connect us to important events (the first shovelful of dirt at a groundbreaking)
5) they often are accompanied by significant words (the words of a toast)
6) they link us to the past (4th of July parades and fireworks)
7) They are communal actions (graduation. Imagine celebrating Thanksgiving in China where no one else has heard of it!)
8) They require people’s wholehearted participation (There's a ritual I love on Saturday afternoons in Eugene, OR - attending an Oregon Duck football game. When you hear the crowd roar, and can't hear yourself think, you've experienced wholehearted participation! Have you attended a Japanese tea ceremony? It's a celebration of the beauty of life’s daily routine)
So I think the problem with regular communion isn't that it can become a ritual. It is a ritual! The problem is in the participants of the ritual! The problem is our lack of consciousness, our lack of focus and attention to the present moment. Prayer, meditation, and especially contemplation are meant to help us be grounded in the present, which is the only moment in which we can respond to God's initiative in our lives.
The quick answer is, no, I don't believe the church has made communion (and by this I mean the celebration of the Mass in which Catholics receive communion) mundane by repeating it each Sunday, or even daily. The problem, I believe, is addressed in my answer to your third question. But for that, you'll have to come back tomorrow!

5 Comments:
The liturgy is never mundane for a true disciple. It is never less than true worship for a true disciple.
I'd like to know, in any case, how another Christian can determine whether or not he is giving God a sincere act of worship.
Seems to me that often times non-Catholic just assume that Catholics are not giving God sincere worship. How would they know?
Louise:
You seem to be implying that true disciples aren't also real human beings: who get tired, discouraged, distracted by many cares, depressed, in a funk, etc. If our marriages, vocations, children - even if deeply loved and cherished - can seem mundane at times, certainly the liturgy can.
In any case, Fr. Mike was responding to an evangelical expressing a concern that is deep and profound in the evangelical world - the fear of "ritual" that is not profoundly tied to one's lived discipleship. Since this is not a characteristic fear among Catholics (who are sometimes prone to ridicule such fears), it is hard for us to take this seriously.
Certainly Fr. Mike wasn't judging whether any individual is sincerely worshipping God. He is simply reflecting what we do know to be true - that many Catholics are not yet intentional disciples.
That we know because 1) only 30% of those raised Catholic in the US (per the Pew folks) attend Mass at least once a month, 38% seldom or never darken the doors of our parishes, and 32% of those raised Catholic no longer regard themselves as Catholic at all; 2) we've spent 16 years listening to thousands of pretty average lay Catholics in pretty average parishes talk about their real life relationships with God; 3) Most stunning of all - we've spent the last 4 years talking to all sorts of pastoral leaders about the subject of discipleship only to discover that a considerable number don't even have a category for "disciple" in their heads.
Connecting the dots about an overall cultural norm is not the same as judging the spiritual status of any particular individual or indeed any particular group of individuals.
Great series of posts Fr. Mike! I have some comments, but I'll wait until you've posted the final installment!
Keith
HUH! Several pastoral leaders in the Church do not have a category for "disciple." Huh. Wow.
I mean - I realize that poor catechesis has done a number on a number of folks, so I'm not as surprised as I sound. It's just that when I think of what pastoral leaders are supposed to be up to and of what a disciple is, it really hits my logic bone to hear that those who ought to be discipling...haven't got it on their radar (for the most part).
This is not good news, but thanks for sharing it, Sherry -- I have sometimes wondered if there's a place in the Church for those of us who see this great lacuna/e...or am I chasing a non-existent problem? Nice to know it really is a lack that needs addressing.
Another interesting blog Fr. Mike. I am still researching my novel and now on the final and most difficult chapter. I dislike ritual but advise people to maintain a routine. I suppose they are the same thing. A ritual as long as it has meaning and purpose is a good thing. I suppose I don't always see the meaning and purpose in some religious rituals! I did research the Dominican order and it was very interesting. My main interest for my novel is known as the "power of the keys". It seems to be controversial in the Catholic church. Many symbols and symbolic phrases are difficult to understand and so have been controversial for many years. I must admit it's the controversy that fascinates me!
My research suggests the keys were one of power and one of knowledge. Some theologians seem to think they were given to Saint Peter and some seem to think the power was given to Saint Peter and the knowledge to Saint Paul. I also think the reason Saint Peter was crucified upside down is controversial or it may be if my novel is published!
Keep writing, I'll be back! My novel is on around 170,000 words now and I'll finish at around 200,000 words. I hope it will be published.
Mike10613
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home