Tuesday, June 24, 2008

The Shack: A "Christian" Novel? Or God as a Jolly African American Woman Named "Papa"

The new stealth religious best-seller, "the Shack" has made it to the pages of the New York Times.

Stealth no more.

The Shack is the sort of book that makes conservative Catholics and evangelicals crazy. An enormously popular blockbuster that is regarded as "Christian" but plays around with many of the basics of the faith. The plot? A grieving father who meets God in the form of a jolly African-American woman.

"Early in the novel the young daughter of the protagonist, Mack, is abducted. Four years later he visits the shack where evidence of the girl’s murder was discovered. He spends a weekend there in a kind of spiritual therapy session with God, who calls herself “Papa”; Jesus, who appears as a Jewish workman; and Sarayu, an indeterminately Asian woman who incarnates the Holy Spirit.

The Times refers to "The Shack" as a 'Christian' novel.

Understandably:

Sales have been fueled partly by a whiff of controversy. Some conservative Christian leaders and bloggers have attacked “The Shack” as heresy. The Rev. R. Albert Mohler Jr., president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, devoted most of a radio show to the book, calling it “deeply troubling” and asserting that it undermined orthodox Christianity. Others have said the book’s approach to theology is too breezy to be taken seriously.


But it has obviously hit a chord:

Brad Cummings, a former pastor and the president of Windblown, said the company, which first shipped books out of his garage, spent about $300 in marketing. Word of the book ripped through the Christian blogosphere, talk radio and pulpits across the country.

Love the $300 marketing effort. .

“Everybody that I know has bought at least 10 copies,” Mr. Nowak said. “There’s definitely something about the book that makes people want to share it.”

Thousands of readers like Mr. Nowak, a regular churchgoer, have helped propel “The Shack,” written by William P. Young, a former office manager and hotel night clerk in Gresham, Ore., and privately published by a pair of former pastors near Los Angeles, into a surprise best seller. It is the most compelling recent example of how a word-of-mouth phenomenon can explode into a blockbuster when the momentum hits chain bookstores, and the marketing and distribution power of a major commercial publisher is thrown behind it.

Just over a year after it was originally published as a paperback, “The Shack” had its debut at No. 1 on the New York Times trade paperback fiction best-seller list on June 8 and has stayed there ever since. It is No. 1 on Borders Group’s trade paperback fiction list, and at Barnes & Noble it has been No. 1 on the trade paperback list since the end of May, outselling even Mr. Tolle’s spiritual guide “A New Earth,” selected by Ms. Winfrey’s book club in January.



Have you read the book? What did you think? What is so compelling about "The Shack" that Christians are buying in in huge quantities despite its obvious flaws?

10 Comments:

At June 24, 2008 8:57:00 AM MDT , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why the slam against "conservative Catholics" Sherry? I've not read any critiques of the book from them. I would suggest that it would also make "liberal Catholics" crazy because it's pietistic or sentimental or whatever.

I get a little tired of your slams against "conservative" Catholics when you, for example, were tied up and burned at the stake over at the Commonweal blog.

The most consistent critique of The Shack has been from Mark Driscoll at Mars Hill. He drilled it, mocked, it, etc.

 
At June 24, 2008 10:19:00 AM MDT , Blogger Sherry W said...

Anonymous:

I wasn't slamming "conservative" Catholics or evangelicals at all. Didn't dream of it. I was simply observing that those who take historic orthodox belief seriously (and therefore tend to fall into the conservative camp) find such hugely popular "Christian" books such as The Shack intensely frustrating.

All I was asking was "why are books like the Shack so compelling for so many Christians when they don't correspond to historic Christian belief in so many areas?" Which is an essential conservative question, you know.

Since I do take Catholic teaching very seriously, in the overall spectrum, I probably do fall into the conservative end of the Catholic spectrum myself although I avoid political labels because I don't think that really thinking with the Church fits into American political categories at all.

The debate over at Commonweal was about the whole validity of the idea of "intentional discipleship" which simultaneously raised nearly as many hackles on conservative blogs. Seems the concept of discipleship is capable of offending Catholic across the spectrum.

Which makes more sense now that the Pew survey reveals that 40% of Catholics don't even believe "in a personal God with whom a relationship is possible."

 
At June 24, 2008 10:30:00 AM MDT , Blogger Joe Waters said...

Anonymous,

As a Catholic, I find the book, as it has been described, "deeply troubling." It strikes me as theologically sloppy and heterodox. Does that not bother you? Sherry is not slamming conservative Catholics. Rather, I think she is noting that their strong commitment to doctrinal orthodoxy would give them problems with a book that plays very loose with essential matters of the Faith.

I do think that what you perceive as "slams against 'conservative Catholics'" are simply Sherry's efforts to point out that any time Catholicism becomes embedded with an ideology of any type it comes dangerously close to being more faithful to its conservatism, neo-conservatism, liberalism, traditionalism, evangelicalism, etc. than to Jesus Christ. Sherry is very fair in her criticisms of both left and right because the sins are, ironically, the same on both "sides." Let us renew our commitment to friendship with the Lord Jesus.

Peace,
Joe

 
At June 24, 2008 11:15:00 AM MDT , Blogger Sherry W said...

Just a reminder:

We ask that all commenters identify themselves here and do not comment anonymously. Thanks.

 
At June 24, 2008 12:09:00 PM MDT , Anonymous The Sheepcat said...

Sherry, I heard of The Shack for the very first time just a month ago, and your post is the first mention I've noticed on a Catholic blog.

Obviously the book has struck a chord, so I'll be interested to find out what's so compelling about it. Who are its readers?

 
At June 24, 2008 12:54:00 PM MDT , Blogger KathleenLundquist said...

My husband Gary read the book, and he read several sections of it aloud to me.

A handful of mitigating factors can be found as to the fanciful, sloppy theology: "Papa" turns back into a masculine presence at the end (though for my taste it was too little too late), and the protagonist (whose daughter has been murdered) is encouraged along the pathway of a positive, "clean" grief process.

However, there was one passage that Gary read to me that I (as a "conservative Catholic", I guess) found exasperating. There's a scene in which all the Persons of the Trinity are present with the man, discussing the nature of their (the Trinity's) internal relationship. I don't have a copy of the book to quote, but I remember being struck by the phrases "no hierarchy... only relationship... It's the relationship the makes us what we are..." - something close to that. It seemed simply to be the author's personal contemporary fantasy of the Trinity - perhaps how he personally related to or envisioned the Trinity, but presented in a story-stopping preachy style that makes the sympathetic reader sit up and listen while the author Teaches You Something. I was put out both by the content and preachy tone of the section.

Also, the thought occurred to me that the author's picture of "relationship" within the Trinity excluded the one foundational relationship that tradition teaches us about God - the relationship between the Father and the Son. If the author is a Christian, his (at best) fanciful personal vision or (at worst) reckless heretical speculation undermines the traditional understanding of the nature of the Trinity at precisely the time that we need such an understanding to undergird our notions of the family.

That's my $0.02.

 
At June 25, 2008 3:05:00 PM MDT , Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's good Augustinian and Thomistic Trinitarian doctrine that the persons of the Trinity 'are' their relations. In Augustine and Thomas, 'relation' is a logical category (taken from Aristotle and made substantive). Moderns, some of them liberal, but also Papa Ben himself, commonly say that the persons of the Trinity are 'relationship'. The term doesn't come from the colloquial use of 'relationship', but from ancient Christian tradition.

Francesca (conservative RC)

 
At July 4, 2008 2:43:00 PM MDT , Blogger God's Whistleblower said...

Re: The comments about "relationship" and the three persons of the Holy Trinity-- duly noted,but we must remember the essential Catholic Truth, that the Holy Trinity is made up of three persons-- in other words, we must not lose sight of the personhood of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit-- if we did, we'd surely be missing out on allot, especially our own retlationship with the three of them! Thanks, and God Bless!

 
At August 6, 2008 4:52:00 AM MDT , Anonymous Christine said...

Your concerns about "no hierarchy"in the Trinity are also a deep concern for me. According to Scripture, Jesus was heard because of His reverent submission to His Father. He obeyed His father to the point of death. We are commanded to follow Christ's example of obedience and submission.These truths have become very unpopular in our society. Another problem I have is the book's trivialization of sin. It seems that we should just let everybody off the hook because God is a really nice guy that wouldn't hurt anyone. This is completely contrary to the God of Scripture who is a consuming fire. I fear for those who would see themselves as equal to God, expecting no consequences for their actions!!!

 
At November 18, 2008 10:21:00 PM MST , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree with you christine the concept of a loving and forgiving God is true but the whole book really steers away from hell and punishment from ones sins., i dont get why people think they can take that as a good example!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home