Sunday, April 20, 2008

A Christian Life That is Convincing

And this from Angelo Matara over at the marvelous Godspy:

He (Pope Benedict) ended by providing the answer to the problem he diagnosed decades ago, in 1968, in his book, Introduction to Christianity. The radical argument made by that book was brought to the public’s attention by Msgr. Lorenzo Albacete in his interview with Charley Rose shortly after the Pope’s election.

According to Albacete, then Josef Ratzinger saw that: “the number one problem with Christianity today is that the Christian life is no longer convincing. It doesn’t convince anyone. So his program is the formation of he says creative minorities, throughout the world, that will offer not words but the witness of a life full of humanity, of peace, of joy, so that people from what is a cruel world will find a home in these communities.”

Reading the Pope’s speech to the bishops, what’s evident is that the Pope is proposing the method of the “creative minorities” to all the faithful. While the Pope will accept a Church that is smaller and more convincing, if that is God’s will, he won’t accept it without a fight: it’s the task of the Bishops to promote the “call to holiness” to all Catholics:

“In a society that rightly values personal liberty, the Church needs to promote at every level of her teaching — in catechesis, preaching, seminary and university instruction — an apologetics aimed at affirming the truth of Christian revelation, the harmony of faith and reason, and a sound understanding of freedom, seen in positive terms as a liberation both from the limitations of sin and for an authentic and fulfilling life. In a word, the Gospel has to be preached and taught as an integral way of life, offering an attractive and true answer, intellectually and practically, to real human problems… I believe that the Church in America, at this point in her history, is faced with the challenge of recapturing the Catholic vision of reality and presenting it, in an engaging and imaginative way, to a society which markets any number of recipes for human fulfillment.

No more Christendom, big battalions assumptions. No illusions about where we stand vis a vis the culture.

But not a barricade/ghetto mentality either. Not small circles, filled with rage and fear, talking to ourselves in language only we understand about subjects that only the initiate understand and care about. Because the ghetto is not the only alternative to Christendom.

Convincing is the word. And who are we seeking to convince? Not just those already in the pews.

I'm reading a couple of really intriguing books on evangelizing post-moderns right now in preparation for our Making Disciples seminars this summer. One book spends a lot of time on the necessity of arousing curiosity about Jesus and the faith through exposure to your own life and the lives of other Christians.

Of course, the obvious, painful, question, the question that must be asked, is "What about my life would arouse curiosity about Christ in a non-believer?"

And a variant question that all of us who blog should ask: What about this blog would arouse curiosity about Christ in a non-believer? Because in a 24/7 internet world, our discussions are not private.

Our discussions - all of them - are a witness.

6 Comments:

At April 20, 2008 2:00:00 PM MDT , Blogger Just Another Beggar said...

Edward:

Uh, wow. I don't understand your anger.

If you are a proponent of the Catholic ghetto, fine. Sherry stated clearly that the ghetto approach isn't the ONLY alternative to Christendom.

Now I take to mean by a ghetto mentality as that type of social structure which is formed from within a subculture to prevent interaction, infiltration, and contamination from outsiders. In a sense, the Church must be that, but only to a point. We must be faithful to Christ. If by fear and arrogance, we relegate others to a second tier of importance since we are Catholic, and they are not, then we transgress against the love of Christ. I assume that you are not in favor of this.

So please, could you tell us why you react so strongly against Sherry's post? And a second question if you would, how do you fulfill the call to the New Evangelization?

Just Another Beggar

 
At April 20, 2008 2:07:00 PM MDT , Anonymous Susan said...

The other phrasing of your question is the line on the old bumper sticker: If I were accused of being a Christian, would there be enough evidence to convict me?
I talk about our call to proclaim Christ as did the early disciples in a blog post I made yesterday, which can be accessed here: http://susanjoan.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/the-early-christians/.

 
At April 20, 2008 5:20:00 PM MDT , Blogger Just Another Beggar said...

I'vd read her statements four times. I fail to see the point of your anger. She didn't say America was the ghetto church. Sherry can speak for herself. I'm suggesting that you may be angry because of a misinterpretation.

Sherry...?

 
At April 20, 2008 10:10:00 PM MDT , Blogger Sherry W said...

JAB:

So cheering to return home to a particularly inspired example of how NOT to witness in a response to a post on modeling Christ-like behavior while blogging.

You were right. By "barricade/ghetto" I was referring to some contemporary groups I've encountered, *not* to historic ethnic Catholicism as it existed in this country before V2 *at all.*

Of course, "Edward" could have asked me if that was what I meant - but that would be too easy.

So much more effective to assume bad will and attack.

Which means that "Edward" just isn't the sort of poster we need around ID. HIs comments has been banished as will he himself unless he can bring himself to comment in a civil manner in future.

 
At April 20, 2008 10:28:00 PM MDT , Blogger Just Another Beggar said...

Speaking of ghetto mentality, I'm running into a reactionary response to my being an extraordinary minister of the Eucharist and a lay presider. I'm not sure where you stand, but I'm not in favor of how it is used in the United States. Yet, the bishop in our diocese has allowed it and promotes lay involvement in this manner. My hope is that we can have more clergy involved in the distribution of the Eucharist in Mass in the future, but in the meantime, I am NOT going to let our Lord be treated like he's part of a "pot-luck" dinner.

I would love having an idyllic Catholic culture in the Green Bay diocese, but the liberal inmates have taken over. How do I explain to my intensely orthodox friend that my withdrawal from these ministries will not affect a positive change, but instead create a ghetto reaction?

Your thoughts? Thanks.

 
At April 21, 2008 5:23:00 AM MDT , Blogger Sherry W said...

.JAB:

E-mail me at sherry@siena.org and we can talk a bit.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home