What if the Penalty Were Certain Anonymity?
I have a non-violent solution to the angry young man bursting into the mall/church/school with his assault rifle. Something in addition to the other obvious non-violent options of 1) refusing to give him access to assault rifles, 2) stop filling his head with images - through movies, videos, TV, computer games - which lionize solitary young men wielding assault rifles. It wouldn't stop all such events but it will stop inspiring copy-cat incidents by guys who are going to prove something to the world and become immortal by taking others with them.
All we have to do is make a pact - all of us - all media sources, all bloggers, friends, family, etc. All we have to do is say that the name of any such shooter will never be mentioned again. He will not go down in history like Jesse James or Jack the Ripper. He won't go down in history at all. He will vanish. His story will never be told. The penalty is not just almost certain death. The penalty is certain anonymity. The shooter won't vanish from the mind or eye of God or his family - but he will from history.
Some of this - a good deal of this - is publicity driven. Done by young men who have added dazzling media images to their personal stock of inner darkness and rage. Without those images: of Columbine and Omaha and now Colorado - how many miserable 17 year olds will take that route? They usually do it after months and years of brooding upon such images and stories, seeing themselves as the anti-hero and revenger, whose spectacular end is reported 24/7 all over the world, and endlessly speculated about. A small child's "I'll show them!" magnified a billion times by CNN and FOX and the internet. Now it is "I'll show the world!".
What if we cut the supply? What if he knew for sure that no one would see, that no one would ever know his name, if he took this path? That no media report would ever mention his name or his family or his home town or his childhood or the people who bullied him at school or read the letter or video that he leaves behind. That his fantasies of finally being seen and recognized, of being the all powerful center of attention, could not happen this way. That he could not send a defiant message to the universe this way.
We have to simply stop rewarding this sort of fantasy with 24/7 global notoriety and a place in the Bad Boys of the Universe Hall of Fame.
Publicity is the oxygen that feeds this particular kind of fire. And it is we who control the source of that particular narcotic.

4 Comments:
Thank you for this insightful, cogent,and most clearly expressed piece. Crazed, competitive media are writing our history, creating dark heroes to perpetuate negative myths and models. Sherry, this excellent
essay should be front-page everywhere in this besieged country. Profound
thanks again. Pat Armstrong
I agree heartily. I'd rather remember In Chul Kim than the confused soul from VTech (whose name I have deliberately forgotten).
Who is In Chul Kim? Another young male immigrant from Korea. He came over as a teenager, too. This boy also learned how to use firearms. He joined the Marines and made the ultimate sacrifice overseas.
Just my thought.
This solution was apparent when the online headline read: "'I'll be famous' writes shooter". I saw that and thought "And you news doofuses are doing your best to make sure that he is."
Posting for Stephen Sparrow of New Zealand:
Such a good post Sherry. I'm currently reading Pascla's Pensees. His comment, "The sweetness of fame is so great that whatever we pin it to, we love, even death." Simone Weill talking of folk like Hitler, Napoleon or Alexander the Great described them as "Idolators of history" and she also wanted them consigned to the category of contempt.
Sorry I can't post at moment since in a moment of madness I joined Google blogger and promptly forgot the combination of sign in and passwords, (was out of town for a week) and haven't the time to go digging for them.
Post a Comment
<< Home