Revisiting the Spiral of Silence

Sherry wrote a few days ago about the Spiral of Silence, a communications theory postulated by Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann over 25 years ago. As Sherry succinctly described it, "Neuman's idea is that most people have an intuitive awareness of the majority sentiment within a group, and most are less likely to speak up when they find themselves in the minority. The silencing effect thus reinforces itself: if a 40% minority does only 20% of the talking, they perceive themselves to be even more outnumbered than they truly are and are thus even less inclined to speak. Hence, the spiral into silence.
Neuman found that individuals avoid speaking out on controversial issues due to an innate fear of social isolation."
I believe part of the point Sherry was making was missed. What is sometimes proposed as a Catholic way of living the faith without talking about it may actually be a response to the clearly secular nature of contemporary American culture. In many popular television shows Christianity is often trivialized (think "South Park"), or Catholics are depicted as ignorant and superstitious (e.g., "Dogma"). That is part of the "opinion expressed as dominant by the media." I won't even go into the sound-byte treatment of magisterial pronouncements in the secular press. The media in our country fosters a culture of silence among Catholics.
But while poll after poll indicate 95% or more of Americans believe in God or a universal spirit, our contemporary misunderstanding of the Jeffersonian idea of the separation of Church and State tends to marginalize religious conversations even more. Stephen L. Carter, a law professor at Yale wrote, "The Culture of Disbelief: How American Law and Politics Trivialize Religious Devotion," and advanced the thesis that American law and politics "trivialize" religion by forcing the religiously faithful to subordinate their personal views to a public faith largely devoid of religion. Carter cogently argues that religious beliefs are marginalized in our society and political stances founded on faith treated as invalid. This adds further pressure upon the believer to keep his or her mouth shut.
Contributors at ID are sometimes accused of being "Protestant" or too focused upon talking about faith, rather than living it, or focusing on subjective feelings rather than sacramental reality. I would propose that talking about one's relationship with Jesus, along with participating in the sacramental life of the Church, personal prayer, and performing the corporal and spiritual works of mercy, are all essential elements of the Church's communio.
Fr. Robert Barron, a priest from the Archdiocese of Chicago who teaches theology at Our Lady of the Lake University, describes communio as being like a rose window in a cathedral, "a wheel of light and color, all of whose elements are focused around a center that is invariably a depiction of Christ…it is a symbol of the well-ordered psyche, the well-ordered city, the well-ordered cosmos…Jesus preaches this communio message when he says, 'Seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and the rest will be given unto you.' In other words, find the center, and the periphery will tend to fall into place around it."
If Christ is the center of our life and the object of our love, it would be unusual for him to not crop up in our conversations from time to time. I talk about the people I love with others. I am terrible at keeping really good news I've received to myself. And if we are indeed living our faith and becoming more and more like him, then "through this wordless witness" we will "stir up irresistible questions in the hearts of those who see how [we] live: Why are they like this? Why do they live in this way? What or who is it that inspires them? Why are they in our midst?" Pope Paul VI said, "Such a witness is already a silent proclamation of the Good News and a very powerful and effective one. Here we have an initial act of evangelization." [Evangelii Nuntiandi, 21]
But as the Pope explained, "There is no true evangelization if the name, the teaching, the life, the promises, the kingdom and the mystery of Jesus of Nazareth, the Son of God are not proclaimed. The history of the Church, from the discourse of Peter on the morning of Pentecost onwards, has been intermingled and identified with the history of this proclamation." [EN, 22]
St. Paul certainly talked about Jesus, and was filled with a sense of urgency over the importance of that proclamation. "But how can they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how can they believe in him of whom they have not heard? And how can they hear without someone to preach? And how can people preach unless they are sent? As it is written, 'How beautiful are the feet of those who bring (the) good news!'" Rom 10:14-15
The spiral of silence may explain why we may tend to not talk about our faith. Talk is cheap, but a life lived in such a way that it doesn't make sense unless God exists is bound to generate curiosity - and plenty of opportunities to give the reason behind our behavior.
But the same dynamics that prevent one from speaking against a perceived majority perspective also tend to prevent one from acting in a way perceived as strange – and Christianity is the strangest Way. So it should not be surprising that a recent survey from the Barna Group on Christians in America indicated virtually no difference in worldview and behavior from that of non-Christians.
Labels: don't ask don't tell, evangelization

4 Comments:
Great post, Fr. Mike!
Aside from the fact that Barna isn't a particularly appropriate spokesperson for Catholics, I think he misses the fact that Catholics no longer live in "ghettoes" where a fully Catholic life was possible without the distractions of Enlightenment-generated philosophical, moral, and social mores. Of course, it's much harder to live a fully-committed Catholic life today, given the competition from secular culture. But there is also competition from evangelical culture, which itself is a product of the Enlightenment and has Enlightenment standards for its hermeneutics and evaluation of Scripture as well as its inherent suspicion of authority, etc.
Catholicism's own hermeneutic is premodern and this has been lost somewhat in the past fifty years, but is being restored gradually and I think this will make it much easier for Catholics, not only to talk about their faith, but to do so in a contextual, rational way that does not reduce it to someone babbling about how "Jesus is my best friend" and treating Jesus like a Barbie doll. But before this can happen, the restoration of the concept of God at the center of all things, which is a premodern concept, has to come about and it will come about, for the majority of Catholics, in the liturgy and in the personal devotional arena (Forty Hours, Eucharistic Adoration, devotions in the home, etc.).
Otherwise, just buttonholing someone about their personal relationship with Jesus makes no sense. They may well have a deep, profound, saintly relationship with Jesus, but without some sort of retrieval of and appreciation for God's irruption into history and its consequent sanctification, most people are not going to go out there and "evangelize." Even the Pope said, at least for the present, that Catholicism might be temporarily reduced to small, convinced communities.
Janice Kraus
By the way, since you cite Pope Benedict for his admonition that a personal relationship with Jesus is vital, you should also cite his admonition that doctrine is vital as well. His catechesis on St. Cyril of Alexandria this past Wednesday included the statement that: "anyone who disturbs the least of those who believe in Christ will suffer unbearable punishment." Doctrine is an intrinsic part of a personal relationship with Jesus.
St. Cyril was the one who recognized that John 1.14 was the key to Christology: the Word became flesh and could resolve the error of Nestorianism (that Mary was not the Mother of God).
Janice Kraus
As Walker Percy noted, "perhaps the secret of talking is having something to say." If folks have not experienced Christ, then what do they have to announce? And if they have, then how can they not announce it?
Post a Comment
<< Home