"Growing True Disciples"
This post is a nice follow-up to the one just made by Sherry, I think. I had been working on this yesterday and today, and just saw her post when I prepared to upload this.
I just finished reading a book by George Barna, the president of Barna Research Group, Ltd., a marketing research firm that focuses on issues related to faith and culture. He's an evangelical whose company has conducted research for hundreds of churches and parachurch ministries.
His book, "Growing True Disciples," is interesting in terms of his insistence that the focus of Christian ministry is to encourage and facilitate discipleship. Similarly, Pope Paul VI said in Evangelii Nuntiandi that the Church exists to evangelize, and the purpose of evangelizing, is, of course, to make disciples of Jesus. Barna's book looks at models of promoting discipleship used by different Protestant churches. All of the models demand a lot more from the individual than most Catholics are used to giving. The point that's made clear in the book is that discipleship usually doesn't "just happen," just as any significant change in the way we live doesn't "just happen."
Acts 2:42-47 describes (perhaps ideally) what the early church community looked like. What it describes is a group of people who are completely "sold out" to Jesus; who seek to not only follow his teaching, but to allow his life and power to flow through them. They have made following Jesus the focus and content of their life: all else is secondary
Early on in the book (p. 27), Barna lists the characteristics of a true disciple. They are challenging:
"Disciples experience a changed future through their acceptance of Jesus Christ as Savior and of the Christian faith as their defining philosophy of life.
Disciples undergo a changed lifestyle that is manifested through Christ-oriented values, goals, perspectives, activities, and relationships.
Disciples mature into a changed worldview, attributable to a deeper comprehension of the true meaning and impact of Christianity. Truth become an entirely God-driven reality to a disciple. Pursuing the truths of God becomes the disciple's lifelong quest."
Of course, there's something missing here, yet is present throughout the disciple-making models he presents: a community of faith.
All of his models insist upon regular participation in a church community. It is through engagement with the word (and thus the Word), communal prayer, encouragement from other Christians, and accountability to others - as well, of course, through grace - that disciples are formed. As Catholics, we also include active, conscious participation in the sacramental life of the Church as a crucial, non-negotiable element.
While Barna's book has its flaws, and I don't agree with all of his presuppositions, I appreciate the unrelenting emphasis upon discipleship. He challenges pastoral ministers like myself to ask tough questions like, "Is my preaching, counseling, teaching, and leadership in and out of worship effective in assisting people to become disciples?"
I also have to ask myself if my life reflects the life of a true disciple. Do I consistently obey Jesus' commands and His Church's teachings? Do I love other people in practical ways that cause me to "pour out my life" for them? Have I put the attractions and distractions of this world in their proper place and focused my desire upon knowing, loving and serving God? Is my life "a living Gospel for all people to read"? Am I sharing my faith with others who do not know Christ?
In short, is my life bearing fruit worthy of a follower of the risen Lord?
One of the practices of most of the Christian communities that are successful in promoting discipleship is the setting of personal spiritual goals and practices that may help reach those goals. These goals must be practical, achievable, and specific; not simply "I will be more loving," but "I will stop gossiping about Mary Jane and instead spend time getting to know her better, choosing to discover her good qualities, and pointing out those good qualities as attributes that give glory to God."
That may be a little too specific, but you get the idea.
So that's my project for the next week or so: to re-evaluate my life and pinpoint some areas where I want to grow in my relationship to Christ and the Church, and come up with a gameplan. Maybe I'll share some of what I discover with you. Feel free to do the same.
Labels: intentional disciples

4 Comments:
Hi,
reading "In short, is my life bearing fruit worthy of a follower of the risen Lord?" as well as "Ultimately, the fruits will tell the tale" in the previous post, I've got a question about the approach of looking at fruits.
Can we really look at some quantifiable measure (attendance, donation, even knowledge about the faith) as a good benchmark for spiritual fruits ? I'am getting trained as an economist, so I would be happy if that would be possible. But does the evaluation of a response to God's love really work that way, since he didn't promise us earthly success of any kind if we take up our cross and follow him ?
Looking at the saints, yes many of them are "successful" in such a way during their lifetime, but then there are quite a few, where "success" happens (long) after they died, for example St.Therese of Lisieux or Bl.Charles
Foucauld. (and given the selection process for official canonization, we only see saints who are visibly "successful", but I am sure there are saints whose success are completely unrecognized)
I am an active (student) member of the campus ministry at my university. As preparation for a strategic meeting we have to answer some questions looking at our mission statement along the lines of "What works, what doesn't, what should change". My first instinct as an economist is to look at numbers, which programs attract people, which programs have a lasting impression. But then, is this really what it is about, maximizing sacramental participation ?
Even what Fr.Philip mentioned in a comment, along the lines of "Preach it and they will come", it almost sounds ( I am preemptively apologizing, I am almost sure that I misinterpret him) as simply replacing one sort of tools (crappy marketing) with another (clever preaching, even the personality of the preacher), because they are more effective.
So is it possible (and if so how) to look at "spiritual fruits" if we want to evaluate ourselves about the centrality of Christ in our lives ?
Thanks
Anonymous,
I think you are bringing up a good point. What I hear you saying is what is the difference between being productive and being spiritually fruitful. Productivity is based on how much I produce. Spiritual fruitfulness is based on a lived relationship with the Trinity. From this relationship will flow the fruits of the spirit in Galations 5:22-23 "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance: against such there is no law." The more we actively remove the obstacles that hinder our relationship with God, and more importantly allow God to remove those obstacles within us; than all the more will the Holy Spirit produce the fruits that matter most in our lives. Sure we can have an increase in productivity such as attendance, donations, etc. and as you pointed out not all the saints had such an experince, but we can not say that there is a saint who didn't possess the fruits of the spirit which are the marks of a life surrendered over to God for the sake of others.
Bobby
I think what "Preach it and they will come" does is to clarify the end by specifying the means.
There are a lot of things you could never hope to accomplish only by preaching it. The advice to preach it, then, is a way of reminding you that those other things aren't important.
At the same time, we have faith in the efficacy of Christ's word; not one the Father has given the Son will be lost. So while there are other ways to get people to come, if people aren't coming than we aren't doing a good job of preaching it.
Getting people to Mass isn't the end sought -- getting them to Heaven is -- but it's a good measure of how well we're preaching Christ.
Thanks for your comments.
I agree with the first responder that pastoral "success" isn't best measured in terms of attendance, but in terms of lives changed. That's tough to measure when you're superficially interacting with hundreds of people, as most pastors and lay ecclesial ministers do (not because they don't care to have deeper relationships, it's just the nature of ministry in most Catholic churches)
It's not unusual to have an intense meeting with someone as they go through a crisis, like a loved one's death, unemployment, a crisis of faith, or a thoughtful confession. But observing spiritual growth and fruitfulness requires more time than we're often able to give. Hence, we tend to look at numbers, instead.
At our new workshop called Making Disciples, we encourage pastoral ministers to ask people about their lived relationship with God. It is the only way, really, that we can find out where people are at on their spiritual journey, what their questions and struggles are, and how they see God at work (or absent) from their lives.
In looking for spiritual fruitfulness in my own life, it's helpful to set some specific goals and to consider means that may help them be reached (with grace, of course!) It is also crucial, I believe, to have trusted spiritual companions from whom one can receive honest feedback, lest I presume change that isn't truly there.
The fruits of the Spirit are discernible - and in many ways their own foretaste of the indiscribable joys of heaven - both for those in whom they are found and in those who experience them in others.
Post a Comment
<< Home