Thursday, May 3, 2007

The Challenge of Independent Christianity (part 6)

Posting for Sherry W.

See part 1 here, part 2 here, part 3 here, part 4 here, part 5 here.

Just a reminder for my readers:

NONE of the staff or teachers of the Catherine of Siena Institute have ever been or are currently part of the “Independent Christian” movement! Nor have any of our posters on ID ever been part of it (as far as I know).

I am writing about this movement as a journalist, not an apologist. I am describing the second largest, fastest growing, and most missionary-minded Christian community in the world today because we have to recognize their existence in order to deal with them.

As a journalist, my job is to try to help you grasp the nature and significance of the movement. Since Independent Christianity is complicated to describe, I will spend most of my time describing and secondarily exploring some of the implications for the Catholic Church. I will not be spending my time in a detailed analysis and rebuttal of their many theological problems, not because I agree with their stance but because it would require another 20,000 words to do so and this is long enough as it is!

The Dummies Guide to the Independent Christianity

What does David Barrett mean when he says that this emerging group is “post-denominationalist”? The vast majority of “independent” Christians have “replaced historic denominationalism by non-centralized lifestyle and church order” (World Christian Encyclopedia, p. 29).

A common theme among Independent Christianity writers is rejoicing at having escaped 1700 years of “Constantinian spectator Christianity” that began when Christianity moved from being “a dynamic, revolutionary, social and spiritual movement to being a religious institution with its attendant structures, priesthood and sacraments.” (The Shaping of Things to Come: Innovation and Mission for the 21st Century Church, Michael Frost &, Allen Hirsch)

This movement is often described as the most radical change in the Church since the Protestant Reformation. Many prominent leaders regard even the structures of 20th century evangelicalism as “old wineskins” that can and should be sloughed off in order to open the door to the new things that God is doing today. Novel approaches for classic Protestant ways of doing church is what really sets apart the New Apostolic Reformation. Peter Wagner lists a number of “new wineskins”, including new authoritative structure, new leadership training, new ministry focus, new outreach, and new “power orientation”. (The New Apostolic Churches, C. Peter Wagner, editor, p. 19-25.)

Authority

In denominational Protestantism, the pastor has historically been regarded as the employee of the congregation. As Wagner dramatically puts it,

In my judgment, the view of leadership and leadership authority constitute the most radical of the nine changes from traditional Christianity. Here is the main difference: The amount of spiritual authority delegated by the Holy Spirit to individuals.... We are seeing a transition from bureaucratic authority to personal authority, from legal structures to relational structure, from control to coordination and from rational leadership to charismatic leadership.

The New Apostolic Churches, p. 19-20.

The distinction between clergy and laity, as understood within both Catholicism and Protestantism, is actively repudiated by Independents. Seminary and ordination by a denomination are no longer considered essential pre-requisites for pastoral ministry. Leadership is charismatic. Men and women are “ordained” by their local pastor in recognition of their personal faith and God-given “anointing”. What matters are an individual’s personal faith and holiness, and their demonstrated leadership in evangelism, church-planting, and vision-casting.

Leadership Training

Because seminary is optional, many staff of new apostolic churches are “homegrown” and alternate forms of leadership formation are emerging. The Wagner Leadership Institute is one model of the new style of pastoral formation. Catholic seminarians would not recognize the short courses offered this past November at the Wagner Leadership Institute in Colorado Springs: Prophetic Evangelism, Releasing Your Anointing, and Moving in the Apostolic.

(Sherry’s note: My comments about Ted Haggard were written 11 months before his widely publicized “fall” in November of 2006. Although he is no longer in leadership, the dynamics that he represented are still very much at work and so I chose to retain my paragraphs about him.)

Pastors and leaders do not need to be a part of this new movement in order to be heavily influenced by it. The stature of Ted Haggard, the current President of the National Association of Evangelicals, shows us how the influence of Independent leaders and ideas has moved far beyond the Independent Christianity movement. Haggard’s dazzling smile was featured on the November 4, 2005 cover of Christianity Today, the premier magazine of evangelicalism. He manages to be both an icon of the Independent movement and a top leader among more traditional denominationalist evangelicals—an excellent example of how porous is the boundary between the two. The influence of New Apostolic ideas and practices upon “denominationalists” is facilitated by their common Reformation heritage and, most importantly, a common commitment to evangelism and world mission.

More on ministry focus and outreach in my next post.

1 Comments:

At May 4, 2007 9:08:00 AM MDT , Anonymous Alastair said...

Independent Christians take Ephesians 6:12 very seriously: "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world..." They believe that dealing through prayer with the spiritual obstacles to wide-spread awakening is an essential part of preaching the Gospel.

This is one of the crunch points of the difference between the majority of Catholics today, and the Independent Christians. And yet, if you went back to the early centuries of the Church, you would find that the above statement described a typical Catholic view.

What has happened over the recent centuries is that the Catholic church has been “evangelised” by the Enlightenment, Scientific and Atheist viewpoints and there has been an increasing crisis of faith in anything supernatural.

We can fume and rant all we like about the phenomenal success of the Independent Christians, but in my view “Traditional Catholics” only have themselves to blame. By Traditional I don’t mean those who abide by the Magisterium; I mean those who close their eyes to the fact that the charisms, signs and wonders of Pentecost are for the whole Cathoic Church
- not just some aberration for the “lunatic fringe,” who are to be regarded as a breakaway sect.

If all Catholics actually gave as much attention as the Independents do to: Intercessory prayer; reading and believing the Word of God in Scripture; spiritual warfare; deliverance; prophecy; evangelism… then, added to the riches we already appreciate (the Sacraments; Authority; Mary and the Saints…..) then Catholicism would be truly catholic, and would offer everything anybody could ever need.

The truth is that the Holy Spirit blows where He wills…. And if He is quenched in traditional denominations, He will burst into flame elsewhere, in the hearts of those who are open to Him.

I thought it very interesting that James A should point out that, to Independents “catholicism has the advantage over protestantism that it remained essentially charismatic (i.e. believed in a miracle-working God) in a way that protestantism didn't so much.”

As a charismatic Catholic, I find I have a great deal in common with open-minded Pentecostals and Independent Christians, and they in turn are prepared to listen to what I have to say, because they respect the fact that I understand the Bible, have a personal relationship with Jesus, and exercise the charisms of the Holy Spirit. This means that they are then more likely to listen when I explain what Catholics actually believe and teach, rather than the prejudiced half-truths that they have picked up.

On the one hand, we in the Catholic Church need to re-gain the spiritual strengths that I have already referred to, and in this we can learn a lot from the Ics. On the other hand, we need to be on our guard against getting sucked into the erroneous parts of their teaching, and we need to be prepared to offer them our strengths of clear, authentic teaching; together with a hierarchical structure that (if properly used) provide structure and support and guard against error and abuse.

The most worrying aspect of ICs is their very independence and lack of authority. This is rapidly leading to an even greater fragmentation of doctrine than has already happened in Protetantism; and a growth of “Word of Faith” teachings. Independent Christians put so much emphasis on being “led by the Spirit” and not subject to any authority, that they can easily be misled into thinking that whatever thought pops into their head is from God. And that all they have to do is “proclaim” a healing or miracle in faith, and God will do their bidding.

So, let us learn from each others strengths.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home