Speaking of Reverts
Over at Musings of a Pertinacious Papist, Dr. Phillip Blosser reflects upon the sad reality that a number of men and women who convert to the Catholic Faith from protestantism revert back to their roots and fall away from the Catholic Church.
Here's some of what he has to say in a post entitled, Protestant Reverts: Catholic Dishonesty in Advertising:
I am profoundly disappointed. Yet another of the souls I have seen through from an evangelical Protestant background to membership in the Catholic Church has, after some seven years' sojourn in Catholic parishes, reverted to Protestantism -- to a certain "Bible Covenant Fellowship Church" in Texas.
The sad thing is that these stories are not entirely rare. Sadder still the fact that I understand very well the reason why.Those who fall away from the Catholic Church typically fall into two classes: the (1) lapsed, who simply stop practicing their Faith in any institutional way, and (2) reverts, who return to the practice of some (usually Protestant) non-Catholic form of Christianity. (I realize I'm using the term 'revert' in an unconventional way here.) . . .
The situation with those who revert, however, is less transparent and perhaps even more troubling. These are almost without exception individuals of impeccable character for whom questions of "faith and morals" are of basic importance. When they become Catholics, they do not do so without expending serious effort in endeavoring to understand Catholic teaching, particularly since there is typically a personal cost and social stigma associated with the move they are making, at least in their erstwhile communities of faith.
In my own experience, I have had the privilege of serving as mentor or sponsor to some twenty Catholic converts over the past ten or twelve years. Of this number, three have lapsed, including the only two of the group who were baptized Catholics but never catechized or confirmed. Of the total number, three have reverted to Protestant forms of Christianity -- one, studying to become a Protestant pastor, the other two resettled in evangelical congregations.
So what is it that happens to Protestant reverts? While every individual's story is unique, I think some generalizations are fairly safe. These are generally souls who come from backgrounds already well-rooted in evangelical Christianity, in a life of Bible reading, prayer, and personal relationship with God. When these souls discover the truth about the Catholic Church, they fall in love with her. They are thrilled when they finally come, at least on some level, to apprehend the Catholic vision of the Church and to see and and understand her glory -- "ever ancient, ever new." They love the Church that spans the ages, the Church of St. Augustine, St. Thomas Aquinas, Cardinal Newman, Pope John Paul, Pope Benedict XVI. They love the moral courage of the Church, which stands like an adamantine bulwark against the evils of abortion, pornography, and relativism. They love the magnificent beauty of her ancient European cathedrals, her basilicas, her paintings and sculptures, her Gregorian chant and polyphony (readily accessible in any music store). They love her theology, which they encounter in the writings of great doctors and theologians of the Church. They love her incarnational vision of life, which they encounter in the writings of numerous Catholic novelists.
But then they join a local Catholic parish ...The process usually begins with a desert experience called RCIA (Rite for the Christian Initiation of Adults) -- a series of meetings and classes in which they are treated more like preschoolers than intelligent adults, spoon fed pathological doses of hand-holding and introspection, and treated to ample quantities of shared feelings. If they survive that, they're welcomed into an Amchurch parish, whose music is Haugan and Haas, whose homilies are psychology tips from Dr. Phil, whose art and architecture is a combination of bog Bauhaus and degenerate Art Deco, and whose members never read traditional Catholic authors but whose discussion groups can't stop talking about Richard Rohr, Thomas Groome, Anthony Tambasco, Sr. Joan Chittister, Andrew Sullivan, and John Dominic Crossan.
It would be easy enough to say their conversion to the Catholic Faith was never authentic, or that their understanding was incomplete. . . .Just today I received yet another email from a former student, a mature Protestant, who wishes to take more of my classes and has asked about starting RCIA classes at my church. I know I should be happy, and I suppose (trusting God) I am. Yet I cannot help feeling a bit of the ambivalence Malcolm Muggeridge's Canadian-born daughter-in-law, Anne Roche Muggeridge, expressed when, distraught over the disastrous aftermath of Vatican II, she wrote about converts she knew:
I must confess that some of us, to our shame, earnestly tried to delay them, on the grounds of the growing disorder in the Catholic Church. They forced their way past us anyway, thank God; though the priest I brought them to for instruction and I could not resist saying, when they had their first shocking confrontation with revolutionary priests and nuns over their children's education: "Well, you can't say we didn't warn you!"
The point is, these converts remind one of what one asks of the Church of God, as the old baptism question went; the answer being, "Faith!" (The Desolate City: Revolution in the Catholic Church [1986; Rev. ed., San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1990]) Don't worry. I never remain depressed for long. But my present state of mind is not far from that in which I offered the rant late last year, "Welcome aboard the shipwreck: what converts don't know," (December 13, 2006).
I worry whether, one day, one of these students who gets fired up and converts to Catholicism will want to take me to court and sue me -- or the Church, for that matter -- for dishonesty in advertising.
We've talked about this phenomenon a great deal--the disappearance rate of those who enter the Church. Dr. Blosser approaches the problem from a catechetical point of view, but many Catholic converts speak of an incredibly deep isolation that they experienced after they entered the Church. What is it within Catholic culture that isolates the newly joined in the midst of the most profound experience of communio (rooted in the profound reality of the Eucharist)? How can we help to provide better formation and connection for these men and women, many of whom are making choices that profoundly affect all of the major relationships in their lives?

7 Comments:
Keith:
Dr. Blosser seems to be speaking of only one kind of convert - the intellectually oriented, high culture convert which actually make up only a small percentage of adult conversions annually. (Although those kinds of converts probably make up a significant percentage of the 12% who enter as part of a spiritual journey vs. the 88% who enter for marriage and family reasons.)
I do think isolation and lack of support is one huge reason. A related one may be that the sort of spiritual nurture one is accustomed to is no longer available (one on one discipling, exegetical sermons, all sorts of parish-based formation, contemporary praise and worship - which is big for some people, etc.)
I sometimes use the image of being raised as an Eskimo eating whale blubber and suddenly finding yourself a member of a culture where everyone is a vegan. It can feel that dramatic, that disorienting.
The classic Reformation debates cover only a tiny part of the necessary transition and it is non-doctrinal things that seems to be at the heart of most "reversion".
I agree with sherry w.
To be totally honest, though, I also think the treadbare spiritual condition of many of our over stretched and hard working parishes is also part of the problem. I recently went back to my parents to tend to my stepfather, who sadly, died before I could turn his treatment around. I went back to my family's two Catholic parishes and ran in horror. My Evangelical friends laughed with sympathy, warning me that I'd be bolting for their temples soon and they were nearly right lol. The lay ministers and most of the parishioners were some of the least reverential people I'd ever seen DURING the Mass. I saw "get well" cards being passed around for signature and discussion during mass. I saw servers talk to parishioners and make faces to them during Mass FROM the altar! And these are, um, middle age to older folks, not kids. They made fun of the accent of the African priest. They criticized the politics of the elderly msgr. I almost passed out and still do thinking about it. I stopped attending mass while back there, because it's hard to pray when you are wanting to barf at the irreverence. I detoxed for several weeks by attending daily mass at EWTN in Alabama.
As someone who fits into the 12% category that Sherry W posits above, and who is slated for coming into full communion this Easter Vigil, I hope to be able to add some insight.
I've been in RCIA for more than a year now. I've taken my time even when most people seem to be rushed through it, the typical case being the young to-be married couple, anxious to check off this step in preparation for marriage in the summer.
I do not agree with the quoted article's cynicism about RCIA, not completely. While I think it's partially correct, there is too much of an encounter group about it, the workers are earnest and try to instill some background in the faith. They are doing their best.
I do think I'm already experiencing the isolation. But , I think 'mmajor fan' has it right. We new Catholics are experiencing the isolation that Catholics have experienced for a long time. It's the experience of the threadbare spiritual condition of many churches. Catholics fill up this isolation in their congregations with connectedness in their jobs or families, just like most non-Catholics fill up their own isolation at their Churches. Believe me, I felt very isolated in Protestant congregations many years ago as a teen.
I came to The Catholic Church hoping for peace in my life, for a sense of purpose and a return to faith. I've come to realize, through prayer, that I've come for the wrong reasons. While God is faithful and will give these things that are promised, I must never look upon God as an Ends to My Needs. I must instead report for service to God. I must look for how I can serve others who needs these things to truly serve God.
This being the case, if there is a problem with His Church, then it is up to me to help heal these problems in any way I can. If I feel isolated, I must fill it with devotion, study, adoration, Eucharist and every grace-filled thing that the Church can provide in faith that I will eventually connect with others doing the same.
I do wonder sometimes if many Catholics don't feel, deep in their Spirits, that they are taking Eucharist unworthily and deeply felt guilt over this doesn't paralyze their spiritual lives. I think a lot of Catholics actually believe that their obligation is to take Eucharist every week, so they do it without thinking, which is wrong in itself.
While an Archbishop or the Pope has authority to correct and adjust the Faith Practices of the current members, I do not. I must not point to what is lacking in others to excuse my own shortcomings. Rather than correcting their focus on what they may be doing wrong, I must focus on how to do it right. Maybe someday, I can gain some authority to gently correct others, but I don't see that happening for some time.
Thanks for your discussion here. I agree that isolation and lack of support can be an issue for some, though I'm not sure this always has to take the form of communal bonding devices such as Wednesday evening church dinners and such. It may sometimes be simply a lack of identification with much of anything going on in the parish or even the homilies in the Mass, which may in some cases lack much substance.
On the other hand, I know of the cases of individuals who have bonded with Catholic parishes socially, making fast friends, playing guitars and singing in "praise choirs" during Mass, etc., sometimes for over a decade, without ever formally becoming Catholics (even though they may have illicitly received the Eucharist).
The question is: What constitutes authentic conversion?
Dr. Blosser,
Thanks for dropping by! You've raised a good question. What does constitute authentic conversion? I think it's a case of the catholic both/and. It constitutes a personal decision to follow Chrst (as He is encountered both personally and through the Church) and an engagement with the Christian community on some level--a living out of the reality of our Eucharistic unity.
I guess when I talk about engagement with the community, I'm not necessarily talking about Wednesday night suppers, but the myriad concrete, practical ways of offering myself so that others might deepen their relationship with God, discover their gifts, understand their vocation, and grow as disciples of Christ who are sent out in to the world on a mission.
Wednesday suppers (or othersocial events) are fine, but they don't constitute the depth and breadth of a life of common discipleship.
Converts would do well to seek out small communities within Catholism. They exist. Look for them. Third Orders, Lay associates of relgious orders, other Lay associations of the Faithful (Marriage encounter, Teams of Our Lady, Cursillo, Blue Army of Fatima, St. Vincent de Paul Society,etc.) charismatic prayer groups (which tend to be orthodox in theology contrary to popular misconceptions), bible sharing groups, prayer groups,Knights of Columbus (in many places it is not just a social club), online groups.
I'd also challenge folks to realize that perhaps one of the reasons you were called to the Church was to help build stronger community. This won't happen over night. You'll have to really trust that God will work through you in his time.
Look at the Institute. From what I can tell, it started off slow but now Sherry and folks need more folks (per their website) to offer weekend seminars. The demand is greater than the capacity to meet it.
Dr. Blosser:
Yes, you are asking a wonderful question. Like you, I know converts who wrestled long and hard, in good faith, before entering and still left.
I do wish, that I'd hear more orthodox Catholics acknowledge that these people, who are often very serious in their discipleship, may be telling us something truly critical.
That most people can't live their entire lives based solely upon will and intellectual assent to doctrine. That most Catholics aren't conservative afficianados of high culture who are looking for a bulwark against the spirit of the age.
That,in our own way, we are expecting most evangelical converts to be angelic, to not need any of the spiritual resources they were used to, such as
1) lived community (although 50% of US Catholics are single)or personal support in their faith,
2) to not ask that the practice of the faith heal and transform their lives and that of their families
3) to form themselves on their own;
4) to wrestle successfully with dilemmas that no one in their parish seems willing to talk about;
5) that worship be stripped of all that is personal or familiar in the name of reverence.
We are happiest when converts come because they are unhappy with evangelicalism and longing for history, liturgy, and high culture. When they long to repudiate evangelicalism and all its ways and assumptions. That's often what conservative Catholics mean by "real conversion".
But what if they had flourished in the spiritual lives and discipleship as an evangelical and are entering the Church for other reaons? What if, God forbid, they are not intellectually inclined or political and cultural conservatives? What if they are Pentecostal (I've met them!) or are really spiritually nurtured by contemporary Christian music? And then there are those, like myself, who enter mostly out of obedience.
A common theme in apologetics is the insistance that the sacraments are given to us because we aren't meant to be disembodied spirits, that we need to be saved in a way that is truly human.
But apart from the sacraments, conservative Catholics often insist that converts do just that - try to flourish spiritually in a Christian culture that is *not*, for the most part, centered around intentional discipleship and all that flows from it.
We ask these new Catholics to survive and grow spiritually based upon will and assent to doctrine alone, and to simultaneously refuse to be involved with the familiar, vibrant alternative Christian communities all about them.
In short, we are asking them to be angels without real human needs.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home