Wednesday, January 24, 2007

That They May Have Life

As I was reading through my monthly pile of periodicals, I came across a wonderful article in First Things--a journal of Catholic thought--regarding the latest statement made by Evangelicals and Catholics Together entitled, That They May Have Life. EaCT is, as the name might imply, an ecumenical group that has met for the past decade (and more) highlighting areas where Catholicism and Evangelical belief share unity. While not glossing over very important differences in theology and ecclesiology, Evangelicals and Catholics Together is a great example of authentic ecumenism in action.

That They May Have Life is a statement, according to its introduction, that aims to

. . .make the case for what is commonly called “a culture of life—" and to do so in a way that invites public deliberation and engages questions of public policy. Our primary purpose, however, is to explain to our communities why we believe that support for a culture of life is an integral part of Christian faith and therefore a morally unavoidable imperative of Christian discipleship.


In the contentious political and moral marketplace of ideas, what some denote as the Public Square when referring to the polity, the debate about life issues is often polarizing, with opposing "sides" not able to actually dialogue through the rhetoric. Even within Christianity there is division regarding the morality of abortion and contraception. While the Catholic Church (and the Orthodox Churches) among others, hold to the unchanging and unchanged belief in the evil of abortion, for example, some mainline Protestant churches and other denominations have waivered in their belief. That They May Have Life presents a winsome and powerful case for supporting a culture of life within society.

Although not its primary purpose, I find the statement fascinating in regards to non-Christians. While it clearly uncovers the theological and scriptural foundations for a culture of life, it holds that:

. . .the public policies pertinent to the defense of the humanum are supported by reasons that are accessible to all and should be convincing to all. The term “humanism” is frequently employed in opposition to Christian faith, as in the phrase “secular humanism.” We propose a deeper and richer humanism that is firmly grounded in the bedrock of scriptural truth, that is elaborated in the history of Christian thought, that is in accord with clear reason, that honors the best in our civilization’s tradition, and that holds the promise of a future more worthy of the dignity of the human person who is the object of God’s infinite love and care. This more authentic humanism is in no way alien to Christianity. There is in world history no teaching more radically humanistic than the claim that God became a human being in order that human beings might participate in the life of God, now and forever.


In its fullest expression, Christianity calls and moves people to a deeper understanding and expression of authentic humanity. Through Christ, we can become who we truly are. The Christian labors, then, to create and heal social and cultural structures so that they promote all that is truly and authentically human. And rather than seeing themselves opposed to non-Christians, Christians should eagerly strive to work alongside people of goodwill in a work that can be understood through human reason without recourse to theological or scriptural understandings. In other words, Christians work for the good of humanity and particularly when goals become proposed or "realized," they can be understood by humanity through the use of human reason alone.

I know that there is much suspicion of religion (particularly Christianity) within American discourse, but the statement made by Evangelicals and Catholics Together rightly and clearly hits the nail on the head. Deeply held beliefs of any nature (including religion) should not be excluded from the Public Square. In particular, Christians need to make a case for the rightness of their positions on Life Issues that are accessible to those who share a different view, attempting to educate and convince, and such deliberations should take place within the pluralistic and democratic structures of our country. Despite what other pundits and possessors of opposing viewpoints might think, Christians in no way wish to create a Theocracy.

This is reiterated in the final words of the statement:

We cannot and would not impose this vision of a culture of life upon others. We do propose to our fellow Christians and to all Americans that they join with us in a process of deliberation and decision that holds the promise of a more just and humane society committed, in life and law, to honoring the inestimable dignity of every human being created in the image and likeness of God. For our part, as Evangelicals and Catholics together, we refuse to despair of the power of public witness and persuasion in the service of every member of the human community, for whom Christ came “that they may have life and have it abundantly.”


Although the statement can not be said to reflect the whole of evangelical thinking (one of the unintended fruits of the Reformation), it does, in fact, encapsulate Catholic thought and belief quite well. I encourage everyone to read this powerful and moving document--especially those who hold an opposing viewpoint.

3 Comments:

At January 24, 2007 3:33:00 PM MST , Anonymous Bill said...

Damon Linker, a former editor of First Things wrote a searing expose of ECT in his detailed book on Richard John Neuhaus, the neocons and theocons. Entitled, THE THEOCONS, this book has had no counter from those at First Things.

Linker makes a good case of how Neuhaus and others tried to make the Iraq war a holy war for Christianity. Neither Neuhaus, Novak nor Weigel have taken any responsibility for a war gone awry. And to call it "Christian?"

Contrary to their statement many in that camp have been trying in every way to impose Christian culture on all Americans.

One has to give the evangelicals credit though. They came out strongly against torture in a scathing letter to President Bush while First Things was virtually silent for a long time and when it finally did, it made the absurd jump comparing torture to the "use does not take away the use."

I would think that "Intentional Catholics" would know better than to get involved with this kind of distorted Christianity.

 
At January 24, 2007 5:53:00 PM MST , Blogger Sherry W said...

Bill:

Keith's comment was entirely focused upon something other than the war in Iraq. Neither he nor I are theocons, neocons, or paleocons or for that matter, "cons" of any kind. Keith wasn't expressing any opinion at all about Neuhause or Weigel's advocacy for the war because he wasn't talking at all about that.

Indeed, the only way I even knew what you are talking about is because I've seen those terms thrown around on blogdom. Just like other aspects of the culture wars, on Intentional Disciples, we try to think first as Catholic followers of Jesus Christ and not primarily in other categories.

When we regard the war or any other topic, we try to make a serious attempt to think with the Church as best we can. While we all have our natural predispositions or kneejerk assumptions, they are not the final word. We also recognize that serious Catholics can legitimately disagree on the prudential application of Church teaching in a real world situation.

Therefore, posters on ID are asked not to impune the intentions or good will of other posters. I delete posts that do so. We ask that you assume other posters mean what they actually say and not more or less and that you respond to what they have *actually* said or ask questions to clarify what they have said.

It is entirely possible to quote something that Richard John Neuhaus says without buying into any of his opinions or political beliefs.

 
At January 24, 2007 9:45:00 PM MST , Blogger Keith Strohm said...

Bill,

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Sherry gave a good summary of what we are about and what I was tring to get at through my post.

My real focus wasn't the War in Iraq or the original Evangelicals & Catholics Together statement, but rather how their most recent statement, That They May Have Life, is consonant with Catholic teaching and points us to engaging with the culture in a way that can speak to that culture without the use of purely theological language.

As Sherry mentioned, my post in no way indicated any support for the political beliefs of Weigel, Neuhaus, Novak, etc. To make it even clearer, I will say that I strongly disagree with their applications of Church teaching with regard to the war.

I do hope that you continue perusing ID as we continue the important discussions revolving around the mission and formation of the laity.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home