Monday, January 15, 2007

Love in a Time of Prophecy

As we celebrate the memory Martin Luther King today, I think it is appropriate to reflect on his life and work. I spent the morning reading his Letter From Birmingham Jail. It is a powerful letter, a response to critics who thought that King's direct civil disobedience was the wrong way to go about gaining recognition of the Civil Rights of African Americans.

Among many prophetic statements, this one jumped out at me, and I ended up re-reading it like five times:

But the judgment of God is upon the church as never before. If today's church does not recapture the sacrificial spirit of the early church, it will lose its authenticity, forfeit the loyalty of millions, and be dismissed as an irrelevant social club with no meaning for the twentieth century

There is an intentionality that we must bring to our lives as followers of Jesus Christ--a willingness to give of ourselves from the very core of our being, an openness to sacrifice. Without this sacrificial spirit, the Church will, indeed, become irrelevant. I will argue that, for many tens of millions of people in the United States, it is already irrelevant. And that number grows each day.

By abrogating our responsibility to form intentional disciples over the course of at least three generations and turning our back on the full spiritual patrimony of the Church (the sacraments and the gifts of the Spirit), we have become, by and large, ineffective. We are salt that has, indeed, lost its flavor.

Yes, the Church (and para-Church organizations) are active in aid to the poor, acts of charity. But that is only one half of the equation. How effective have we been in transforming the cultures and structures of our societies so that they foster all that is truly human? How effective have we been as radical witnesses of the gospel of Jesus Christ?

I would submit that many, if not most, members of the Church are followers of an obligation rather than a person, The Person, Jesus Christ. That isn't a slam on those individuals. The blame--the judgment (to use Martin Luther King's words)--falls upon us. As the apostle Paul wrote in his Letter to the Romans:

For "everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved." But how can they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how can they believe in him ofwhom they have not heard? And how can they hear without someone to preach? And how can people preach unless they are sent? (10:13-15)

A time is coming when we, as followers of Christ, will not have the luxury to sit idly by with our denuded, culturally compromised Christianity. We must prepare ourselves so that, strengthened by the sacraments, nourished by the Word of God, and united in a common witness, we can embrace our cross as we live out our apostolic mission fully--no matter what the cost.

It. Must. Start. Now.

God has given the Church everything it needs to build generations of intentional disciples who can embrace their apostolic identity--and we are, indeed, our brothers' keepers.

In the words of another prophet, telling forth the Heart of Christ:

The Amen, the faithful and true witness, the source of God's creation, says this: "I know your works; I know that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either cold or hot. So, because you are lukewarm, neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth. (Revelation 3:14-16)

Which will it be?

8 Comments:

At January 15, 2007 5:41:00 PM MST , Blogger Fr. Mike, O.P. said...

Hi, Keith;
This weekend I participated in a Theology on Tap with another priest in a town north of Colorado Springs. Rather than having a program of some kind, the evening was more informal - a kind of "ask the questions about the faith that are on your mind" kind of evening.

I noticed three things about the evening that touch upon your post:

1) almost all the questions had to do with doctrine, with the exception of a question about a private revelation about the "three days of darkness" (which I had never heard about). The questions had to do with just war, immigration policy, purgatory and limbo, and what is the Church doing for adults in terms of formation (a great opportunity to talk about the Catherine of Siena Institute!). Now these are good questions, but I was disappointed that none of them (at least as far as I can recall) had to do with the following of Jesus in a concrete, daily lived relationship. These were all good Catholics who, I believe, are desiring to be faithful.

2) Eventually I had to point out that the other priest and I are NOT the best people to ask about the application of Church teaching in the secular realm. Our role is to hand on the Church's teaching obediently, while the role of the laity is to apply the teaching based on their various competences in the secular world - and to do that well will take a lot of study, discussion, debate and soul-searching.

3) The issue of the just war theory came up several times and with regard to several different wars. Finally, one young adult, who I know to be a passionate intentional disciple asked the questions, "Should we really be trying to justify war? Is that the best way to resolve our struggles? Is the killing of Jesus' brothers and sisters the only way? What does He mean when he tells us to 'turn the other cheek'?" It made me ask basically the same questions you posed in your post -

"How effective have we been in transforming the cultures and structures of our societies so that they foster all that is truly human? How effective have we been as radical witnesses of the gospel of Jesus Christ?"

The issue of being willing to sacrifice, as those who struggled (and continue to struggle) for civil rights in our country did, is something I need to wrestle with, because it's intimately linked to the question, "How willing am I to follow Christ, especially when the road we're on leads to Calvary?"

 
At January 16, 2007 7:49:00 AM MST , Blogger TCYM Lounge said...

I think I may have found a theme for my talk at the youth ministers' retreat...

I'm about to go on a rant at my site about this continuing acceptance that youth ministry is "Sunday night youth group".


ACK. Bleh! BARF!

Life is daily, it is every single choice and if kids aren't transformed what is the gosh darn point?

Yeah, I'm workin' up to a rant...

 
At January 17, 2007 9:56:00 AM MST , Blogger Keith Strohm said...

Frank,

Thanks for joining the discussion. I know that Sherry Weddell has done a great deal of analysis regarding the growth of pentecostal Christianity in the 3rd World. Perhaps when she comes back from her whirlwind tour of the West Coast, she can address some of your questions.

In fact, I'd like to see her develop that into a post. Hmm...I'll see if I can bug her.

 
At January 17, 2007 1:33:00 PM MST , Blogger JaniceKraus said...

I'm flooded with questions, too. My first one is: you keep talking about evangelization and following Jesus, but as Pope Benedict pointed out in Deus caritas est, God is love. But out of that love come obligations and, yes, "doctrines." All doctrines are are quantified reminders of what the love of God entails. There is not a dichotomy here. I don't understand why you keep stressing one over against the other.

And why do you continually hark back to Evangelical and Pentecostal examples. I think it is instructive that Martin Luther King, Jr., a Baptist minister, made his own reference to the early CHURCH. That is something this blog could do much more of.

 
At January 17, 2007 8:17:00 PM MST , Blogger Keith Strohm said...

Janice wrote:
I'm flooded with questions, too. My first one is: you keep talking about evangelization and following Jesus, but as Pope Benedict pointed out in Deus caritas est, God is love. But out of that love come obligations and, yes, "doctrines." All doctrines are are quantified reminders of what the love of God entails. There is not a dichotomy here. I don't understand why you keep stressing one over against the other.

I wrote:
You're right, there is no dichotomy. I mentioned this in our thread above, but I talk about evangelization and following Jesus a lot because there is a functional imbalance in the life of the Church where "doctrinizing" has, in effect, replaced evangelizing as the modus operandi. And so, we have a deluge of men and women leaving the Church to "find" Christ elsewhere.

Janice wrote:
And why do you continually hark back to Evangelical and Pentecostal examples.

I respond:
Largely because pentecostal Christianity is probably THE fastest growing form of Christianity in the 21st century, and it is having a devastating effect on Catholicism in Latin America, for example. If people are leaving the Church in droves, then it behooves us to examine the causes for their "emigration" and study what they might be 'finding' there. They can't all be leaving because Catholicism is too demanding.

Secondly, when it comes to presenting the gospel message of Christ to the world and fostering that initial encounter with Jesus, we can learn a lot from our evangelical brothers and sisters. No, not so that we can "water" down the teaching of the Church or turn Catholics into bible-thumping street preachers, but so that we can more effectively connect men and women to the fullness of the Revelation of God in Jesus Christ.

Janice wrote:

 
At January 17, 2007 8:29:00 PM MST , Blogger Keith Strohm said...

I just thought of another reason why I may be stressing evangelization and following Jesus--and it has to do with the mix of charisms that I received at Baptism. I do need to be aware that the state of another person's relationship with Christ may not be as burning an issue to others as it can be for me.

It is good to be reminded of that.

 
At April 13, 2009 11:17:00 PM MDT , Blogger legionarm said...

Yes, I do agree with you on that, I've always wondered how can a Christian be "non-evangelical" or perhaps they might just have forgotten on the true essence of being a Christian. Sometimes, people needs to be reminded. I often visit this website to remind me of the things I forgotten spiritually, and I must say that it helps a lot.

 
At October 31, 2009 8:35:00 AM MDT , Anonymous Frank M said...

This gap in experience between the charismatic and the non-charismatic is rapidly becoming the new global divide between Protestant and non-Protestant Christians.

Fr. Mike
As I read your response to Keith I was flooded with questions. Questions I’m afraid the “Catholic Culture” either has no knowledge of or refuses to ask.
Why are the mega churches filled to the rafters (with 40% Catholics) and our Masses are only 25% of capacity?
Do cradle Catholics love Jesus as their personal savior that died for them personally?
What role does the Holy Spirit play in their everyday life?

The questions continue but I think you get the point. Pope John II called us all in “NOVO MILLENNIA INGÉNUE” to Evangelize in the main street church.

It. Must. Start. Now.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home